The Miami Valley in Ohio has a network of paved trails that connect ten counties in the valley. Together this makes about 350 miles of trails concentrated on one area. They claim to be the largest network of paved trails in the country and this seems to be reasonable. The hub of this system in a small visitor center called Xenia Station in the town of Xenia. This concentration of trails has made Xenia a popular destination for cyclists that prefer to ride trails.

Before I traveled there I pictured a small town of a few hundred people. I arrived to find a much larger community of over 26,000 people. The Little Miami Trail connects to the Ohio to Erie Trail in Xenia. In addition to these major trails the Creekside Trail also ends at Xenia Station. That means you can go in five different directions from Xenia Station. All these trails in turn connect to other trails across the Miami Valley.

The trails are identified on maps and signs by numbers. The Ohio to Erie is number 1. The Creekside is number 2. The Little Miami uses both #1 and #3. #3 is also the designation of the Simon Kenton Trail. Most of these trails are also part of the US bicycle route designation with an additional numeric designation.

The trails use mile markers that start with Xenia Station as mile zero. This can be a bit confusing if the trail does not start/end in Xenia. That is a bit of a moot point since the markers are painted on the center of the trail surface and almost all are not legible.

Generally these trails are paved, about 12 feet wide with an additional grassy shoulder. The surface is very smooth. The trails are very straight and flat. Exceptions are at road crossings where the trails usually turn a bit so they cross perpendicular to the road. This makes it easier to see in both directions.

More information including a detailed map may be found at the Miami Valley Regional Planning Commission website mvrpc.org/bikeways  

How Far, How Fast

I see a lot of posts on social media about measuring distance traveled on a bike or occasional posts about average speed. Many times it is a debate over the merits of a dedicated cycling device vs a smartphone app. As an experienced cyclist trained in electronic engineering here are some of my thoughts.

Distance is generally measured one of two ways. The device may count revolutions of your wheel, or it may use GPS. Both methods will result in some amount of error. If you assume there is no slippage between your wheel and the riding surface then the first method seems like it should be more accurate. This depends on the system accurately knowing the circumference of the wheel being measured. Usually this is done by entering the wheel or tire size into the system. Assuming you calibrate the system in this way you should get a reasonable accurate distance measurement. There will still be error due to differing tread patterns on the tire resulting in a slightly different circumference. These slight differences add up with each revolution of the wheel. This results in what is know as systematic error. The error is the same all the time since the difference between assumed circumference and actual circumference is constant. Of course tire wear will also introduce some error but you get the idea.

What about GPS? GPS measures the distance from the GPS unit to a satellite orbiting overhead. If you know the location of the satellite, then you know you are somewhere along a sphere with a radius equal to that distance. Do the same with another satellite and you now know you are somewhere along the intersection of the two spheres. A third satellite narrows you location to a single point.

There are a lot of different sources of error with GPS. The distance is determined by the time it takes the signal to travel from the satellite to your location. The signal travels at the speed of light so the times are short. This means time measurements need to be very accurate. Atomic clocks on the satellites assure accuracy. In order to stay in orbit the satellites must orbit a high velocity. Velocities are fast enough to require a correction due to Einstein’s theory of relativity! This is done inside the GPS unit without the user even being aware. So where does the error come from?

The GPS satellite signals can locate you to within a few feet. Software uses additional tricks to increase accuracy. For example, it may use known locations of Wi-Fi hotspots or cell towers to fine tune location. These types of corrections vary with specific devices and manufactures. This leads to slight differences in results.

Another difference is sampling rate. Consider traveling along a curve. If your GPS samples often then your route approximates the curve. If the unit samples less frequently your route will look like a series of straight lines (chords). The straight lines will add to a shorter distance than the circle. There are many other small errors that vary depending on the software/hardware used. These errors are known as random errors.

Speed is easy once distance is determined. Time measurements are very accurate so speed accuracy depends on accuracy of distance.  Reporting speed is another issue. Do you report the speed you see while cruising on a straight away or the average indicated on your device. Road crossings result in a slower average even with auto pause functionality. Rail-trail surfaces typically result in a slower speed than roads. Hybrid and mountain bikes are slower than road bikes. Knobby tires are slower than slick tires.

I have used several software apps and dedicated devices. There is generally some difference in the results. I have also compared results with mile markers along various trails. I have found the differences to be slight, less than 1%. Many cyclists seem to concerned about these errors but unless you are a very elite cyclist doing serious training, I don’t see anything to worry about.

I always carry my phone and don’t see a need for an additional device. There are several apps available for free. Many others prefer a dedicated device. Let’s consider some pros and cons. The dedicated units are much smaller and lighter than a phone. I however prefer the piece of mind of having a phone for medical, mechanical or other emergencies. A respite from phone calls can easily be achieved with the phone power switch, airplane mode or ringer shut off.

One frequently cited difference is battery life. There is no question that a dedicated device has a much longer battery life than a smartphone. That being said, I don’t have any problems using my phone even for rides extending 8 or more hours. Some suggestions for prolonging phone battery life include closing any apps not being used.  Keep your screen shut off unless you are actually using the phone. Since I ride rails-trails navigation is not an issue. Just having the screen on uses a lot of power. Use airplane mode unless you are actually making a call. GPS will continue to work in airplane mode. This is especially important in poor or no coverage areas. Your phone increases power usage to try to maintain contact with cell towers in poor coverage areas.

Shut off Wi-Fi and Bluetooth unless you use Bluetooth sensors for speed and/or cadence. Keep your phone warm. Cold batteries don’t perform well. In cold temps keep your phone inside your jacket. You can also carry a portable charger, a small auxiliary battery that plugs into the charging port. Most are the size of a cigarette lighter.